Don’t Kill the Messenger
Since its inception, Bromography has offered opinions on dozens of eateries. We strive to provide fair and accurate reviews which provide potential patrons with useful information, while respecting the efforts and hard work of the business owner, even if those efforts do not result in the best restaurant.
There are many bloggers who use the anonymity of the internet to say and do things that they would not have the courage for in a face-to-face setting. Bromography’s goal is to avoid this behavior for two important reasons. (1) My grandmother would consider it the height of rudeness; and (2) the internet can be a dangerous weapon. Anything posted online seems to live forever, and finds its way to many obscure corners of the world. Despite the fact that Bromography’s slice of the internet is minuscule, our opinions are disbursed and syndicated through Yelp, Urbanspoon, Trusted Opinion, Foodbuzz, CitySearch, MenuPages, Facebook, Twitter, rss feeds, email subscriptions and several dozen other websites. It is very easy for bloggers (and restaurant owners) to spread unfair statements with no way to pull them back.
Recently, a restaurant review posted on Bromography came to the attention of the owners of the establishment. They were not happy and reacted, in my opinion, rather excessively. The owners visited several of the websites which syndicate Bromography; flagged the review as “offensive” or “objectionable”; and requested that the review be removed. It is difficult to determine exactly how many syndicating websites were contacted as Bromography may not have been notified by all. (I am not aware of any site removing the review.) Bromography’s review is not the only less-than-positive review on the web, so I was puzzled by the intense reaction. I do not believe that anything on our site can be considered “offensive” or “objectionable.” It is entirely possible that this may be the owners’ standard response to any negative mention of their establishment. I may never understand the thinking behind these actions, but I must confess that I am now much more in sympathy with the more strident and pointed critical reviews of this restaurant.
I have not removed or changed a single word of the review in question, but I did visit the restaurant and spoke with the owner directly. I made some suggestions which I hope they and other owners take. First, an email or blog comment is a better way to start a dialogue about a negative review. Second, keep things in perspective. A review is only one opinion in a world full of opinions. Finally, investing more effort into providing exceptional food and service is a better use of time and energy than a spiteful online campaign when fighting a review. The word of mouth spread by satisfied patrons has more power than any website.




I think these type of actions by a restaurant make me want to visit them much less than reading an unfavourable review. You always read a review with a grain of salt, knowing that it is possible that the reviewer was there on a bad night, or ordered the ‘wrong’ dishes or their server had just been broken up with or something. Actions such as these, however, speak much more deeply about the manner and spirit in which the establishment is run.
It is a pity that the review process is so often manipulated and compromised. But those who distort the truth are the bloggers who choose to stay anonymous. Good for you to stand behind your review.
Bloggers should not post anything that they would not state directly to the subject or any readers. Most people can receive criticism well if it is fair, constructive and delivered politely. Since we consider every post to be all three, there would be no reason to not stand behind the review. Quite frankly, after meeting me in person, the owners seemed embarrassed by their actions.
I have to say I don’t get that either. It can be considered bad press, but if it is objective and not insanely specific then it just means they have to try harder to serve their customers.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
Jason
Most readers can discern whether a reviewer is slanted against a restaurant, and there is always the ability to try the place out personally. Thanks for commenting!
I absolutely agree with you that a review is only one opinion…and blogs feature the opinions of their authors. A few months ago I received a rather nasty comment on my blog about a review I did of a cupcake bakery. This reader did not agree with my review of the frosting…but I did not like the frosting. I had positive things to say about the bakery but just did not like the frosting. Please don’t bash the messenger…try the frosting yourself and form your own opinions (this is a metaphor).
Love the frosting metaphor!